All insights
Investment Policy15 May 20256 min

Why Europe became more attractive to Chinese carmakers, not less

Washington's tariffs pushed Chinese manufacturers toward Europe at the same moment Brussels raised its own barriers. The result is not retreat but a shift in how they arrive — and Africa is not the alternative it is assumed to be.

The obvious reading of 2025 was that Chinese manufacturers, squeezed by tariffs on both sides of the Atlantic, would look elsewhere. The obvious reading is wrong, and understanding why matters for anyone competing with them or selling to them.

Two pressures pointing the same way

The Trump administration's tariffs are aimed at Chinese exports to the United States, but their effect is global. Two things follow, and they pull in opposite directions.

Chinese companies facing a closing US market look for diversification, and the relative importance of Europe rises — more exports, more investment, to offset what is lost elsewhere. At the same time, the broader uncertainty that trade friction creates weighs on European demand and consumer confidence, which works against those same exports.

On balance Europe's position as a destination has strengthened, and the appetite on both sides for trade and investment cooperation has increased with it. The competition for the European market intensifies precisely because the American one is harder to reach.

What makes Europe worth the trouble

Scale and maturity. Europe is the world's second largest electric vehicle market. Battery-electric sales across the 27 EU member states reached 1.993 million units in 2024, around 15% of the global total — 13.6% of the EU new car market that year, on ACEA's figures. Sales fell 1%, the first such decline. But carbon regulation and the technological transition underneath it still set a long-run floor. European consumers accept intelligent and environmental features readily, which is precisely where BYD and NIO have built share — on cost-effectiveness plus specific technology, blade batteries and assisted driving among them.

Genuine industrial interdependence. This is the part most often missed. CATL supplies batteries to BMW and Mercedes-Benz. Volkswagen's China R&D centre now pushes technology in the reverse direction, back toward Europe. The relationship is not one of exporter and market; it runs through both companies' supply chains.

Uneven policy. EU duties on Chinese electric vehicles run 17% to 35.3%, but several countries continue to subsidise purchases. The UK market grew 21% in 2024.

What makes it hard

Policy and cost. Tariffs plus the carbon border adjustment mechanism have raised the cost of exporting into Europe, which is what pushed manufacturers toward local production — BYD's Hungarian plant being the clearest example.

Price competition from incumbents. Volkswagen and Stellantis have defended share by cutting prices, forcing Chinese entrants into trading price for volume and compressing margins.

The premium ceiling. European luxury remains the preserve of established brands. BYD's Yangwang U8 at CNY 1.098 million is an attempt to move upmarket, and its share remains small. Brand premium is the bottleneck, not product capability.

The premium problem, and the three ways round it

The question of how Chinese manufacturers raise profit rather than volume has a specific answer, and it is not simply "charge more".

Acquire it. Buying or investing in European firms with established technology or brand value transfers patents, know-how and brand equity directly, raising the value of the acquirer's own products.

Build it. Positioning and sustained marketing investment, until consumers will pay more for the badge. Slow and expensive.

Borrow it. Partnering with high-end European suppliers, so component and service quality carry the price.

All three require the return to justify the outlay — a caution worth stating, because the premium route is where the money gets lost.

In practice the strategy is running on two tracks at once. On differentiation: NIO's user community model and XPeng's intelligent cockpit target younger European buyers rather than competing head-on with incumbent luxury. On cost: BYD's Hungarian plant cuts logistics, CATL's German plant avoids duties, and vertical integration into own-design chips (Horizon's Journey series) and batteries (SVOLT) reduces procurement cost.

Premium at the top, cost control at the bottom. The middle is where the price war is.

Africa is not the alternative

There is a persistent assumption that if Europe closes, Africa opens. The data does not support treating them as substitutes.

Africa remains a combustion market. Battery-electric penetration was under 1% in 2023. Chinese manufacturers hold over 30% of the African market on cost — selling roughly 20% below Japanese competitors. Beiqi Foton delivered 100 heavy trucks in Ethiopia and runs 220 dealers. Great Wall's Haval sold close to 20,000 vehicles in 2023 through KD assembly and local marketing. Chery and Geely cover the mid-to-low end with SUVs and pickups at CNY 50,000–100,000.

Electric potential is real but narrow. South Africa targets 20% of new cars electric by 2025; Kenya's 2024 restriction on combustion vehicles pushes the same way. Ethiopia and Tunisia have removed EV import duties, and Morocco is building charging networks. Against that: charging coverage in South Africa sits at 0.3%, grids are unstable, and buyers prefer combustion — which is why leasing and instalment models matter more than product.

Localisation is already happening. GAC has a South African plant, BYD a KD facility in Zambia. Nezha runs a 10% deposit programme in Kenya. Direct monetary incentives are constrained by currency volatility; the durable answer is local-currency settlement and supply chain finance through Chinese banks.

Where electrification has landed, it has landed in commercial vehicles — Yutong leads electric bus share in Nigeria and Ghana, and BYD's e6 sells over 500 units a month in South Africa.

Africa is a volume market for combustion vehicles and a long-dated bet on electrification. Europe is a margin market. A company losing access to the United States needs the second, and Africa cannot provide it.

What this means if you are on the European side

Expect more investment, not less, and expect it as production. The tariff structure has already converted export pressure into factory commitments. That changes what a Chinese competitor looks like — a local employer with local suppliers, rather than an importer.

The interdependence cuts both ways. If your battery supply runs through CATL, "competing with Chinese manufacturers" and "depending on Chinese manufacturers" are the same sentence. That is a supply chain question to answer deliberately rather than discover later.

Watch acquisitions of mid-tier suppliers and brands. If the premium gap is the binding constraint, and buying it is the fastest route, the assets that close it are European engineering firms and heritage marques. That is where the next wave of approaches will land.

Europe did not become less attractive when it raised duties. It became harder to export to — which is a different thing, and one that Chinese manufacturers have already priced.

Sources

Discuss this topic

Want to go deeper on this?

Send a note and it reaches our advisory team directly.

Have a question not covered above?

Leave a note and it reaches our advisory team directly.